Why Impact Crusher Over Cone Crusher in Ethiopia Basalt Crushing

Ethiopia, known for its rich geological diversity, is home to abundant basalt deposits. Basalt, a volcanic rock, is extensively used in construction, road building, and as aggregate in concrete production. The choice of crushing equipment is critical in the processing of basalt to achieve the desired size, shape, and quality of the final product.

In Ethiopia, the choice of crushing equipment for basalt processing is significantly influenced by the weathered nature of the material. While cone crushers are traditionally used for hard basalt in many regions, impact crushers have emerged as the preferred option in Ethiopia due to their specific advantages in handling weathered basalt. This article explores the reasons why impact crushers are often preferred over cone crushers for basalt crushing in Ethiopia.

6 Advantages of Using Impact Crusher to Process Basalt in Ethiopia

1. Material Characteristics and Crushing Mechanism

• Better for Weathered Material： Impact crushers utilize high-speed impact forces to efficiently break down softer, weathered basalt, making them more suitable than cone crushers, which rely on compression.
• Soil Tolerance: Impact crushers are less likely to clog from sticky clay, avoiding issues related to mantle and concave gaps found in cone crushers.

2. Production Capacity and Efficiency

• Impact crushers allow adjustable output size by simply changing rotor speed or adjusting the gap between impact plates and blow bars.
• Cone crushers require adjustments to the crushing chamber, which can be slower and more complex.
• For medium to high-capacity basalt crushing (e.g., 100-400 TPH), modern impact crushers can compete with cone crushers in efficiency.

3. Cost & Maintenance Considerations (Key for Ethiopia)

• Lower initial cost: Impact crushers are generally cheaper to purchase and install than cone crushers, making them attractive for budget-conscious projects.
• Easier & cheaper maintenance: Replacing blow bars or impact aprons is simpler and faster than replacing cone crusher mantles and concaves, which require dismantling the chamber.
• Availability of spare parts: Impact crusher parts (blow bars, impact plates) are often more readily available and cost-effective in developing markets like Ethiopia.

4. Shape and Size of End Product

The shape and size of the crushed product are critical factors in the construction industry. Impact crushers are known for producing a more cubical and well-graded product, which is essential for various applications, including asphalt and concrete production. The angular shape of the aggregates produced by cone crushers may not be as desirable for certain applications. In Ethiopia, where the construction industry is rapidly evolving, the need for high-quality aggregates is paramount, making impact crushers a better choice.

5. Mobility & Setup (If Needed)

• If the project requires a mobile crushing plant, impact crushers (in the form of mobile impact crushers) are more compact and easier to relocate than cone crushers.
• This is useful for Ethiopia, where infrastructure may demand flexible crushing solutions.

6. Versatility and Adaptability

Impact crushers are versatile machines that can handle a wide range of materials, including soft, medium, and hard rocks. This adaptability makes them suitable for various applications beyond basalt crushing. In Ethiopia, where the geology may vary, having a crusher that can efficiently process different materials is beneficial. Impact crushers can easily adjust to different feed sizes and material types, enhancing their utility in diverse crushing scenarios.

When a Cone Crusher Might Be Better

• If the basalt is extremely hard and abrasive, a cone crusher with a hydraulic adjustment system and high-quality manganese liners may last longer.
• For fine crushing stages (producing <20mm aggregates), cone crushers can be more efficient.

Ethiopia’s Basalt Crusher Machine

For most basalt crushing applications in Ethiopia—especially where cost-efficiency, ease of maintenance, and good particle shape are priorities—an impact crusher is often the better choice. However, if the project demands ultra-fine crushing or extreme abrasion resistance, a cone crusher could be considered for secondary or tertiary stages.